Developing Dispossession: Infrastructure, Cultural Production and Legal Discourse in Treaty 3
dc.contributor.advisor | Farish, Matt | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ekers, Michael | |
dc.contributor.author | Barr, Caolan | |
dc.contributor.department | Geography | |
dc.date | 2018-11 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-11 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-15T21:03:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-15T21:03:15Z | |
dc.date.convocation | 2018-11 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-11 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines how dispossession was produced for Anishinaabeg communities of Treaty 3 through interlocking processes of legal discourse, cultural production and development. It traces the genealogical origins of infrastructure through a series of dams built across Northwestern Ontario from 1871 until 1926. In Treaty 3, the discursive foundations for infrastructure and development were laid through a series of expeditions and legal decisions that justified and facilitated settler expansion. Likewise, development involved a set of mutually constitutive and reciprocal forms of epistemic, ontological, symbolic and material violence. In this work, I argue that dispossession is structural to settler colonialism and the defining feature which ties a set of seemingly disparate histories and processes together in Treaty 3. Recognizing gaps in the literature and colonial archive, I call for the development of new practices of inquiry that allow us to provincialize and unsettle the normativity of colonial violence and narratives. | |
dc.description.degree | M.A. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1807/91630 | |
dc.subject.classification | 0366 | |
dc.title | Developing Dispossession: Infrastructure, Cultural Production and Legal Discourse in Treaty 3 | |
dc.type | Thesis |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Barr_Caolan_201811_MA_thesis.pdf
- Size:
- 1.05 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format