Under Layered Suspicion: A Review of CRA Audits of Muslim-led Charities

Abstract

Muslim-led charities have for years expressed concerns about the selection, frequency, and reasoning behind audits of their organizations.

The findings from Under Layered Suspicion suggest that there is a basis for these concerns. The report draws attention to the Government of Canada’s approach to anti-terrorism financing and anti-radicalization, and the legitimate concerns of bias embedded within their framing. When operationalized by the CRA, these policies seem to make Muslim-led charities exceptionally vulnerable to audits, or worse, revocation of charitable status.

The targeting of Muslim-led charities not only undermines the critical work these organizations do to combat racism and discrimination in society, but also calls into question Canada’s commitment to inclusive multiculturalism.

This research reveals the need for a formal commitment and concentrated effort by the Government of Canada to investigate patterns of bias within the machinery of its agencies and bureaucracies.

Description

Under Layered Suspicion identifies whole-of-government policies and patterns of audit practices that together demonstrate potential biases in Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) audits of Muslim-led charities. The report was issued by the Institute of Islamic Studies at the University of Toronto and the National Council of Canadian Muslims.

Keywords

islam, muslims, charities, audits, tax, policy, bias, Canada

Citation

DOI

ISSN

Creative Commons

Creative Commons URI

Items in TSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.